Key Points
- National median CNA pay rose 47% in current dollars from 2013–2023.
- After inflation, real CNA pay rose only about 12%.
- Only 11 percent of CNAs belonged to a union in 2025.
Unpack the ACA's real effects on CNA salary trends, insurance access, and job growth in 2026.

By 2016, more than 20 million Americans had gained health insurance through the Affordable Care Act’s coverage expansions. For certified nursing assistants, who handle daily physical care in hospitals, nursing homes, and private homes, that sudden influx of newly covered patients raised a central question: did the policy shift translate into better wages and more job security?
The answer is layered. Demand for CNAs grew, but pay increases were inconsistent across states and largely eroded by inflation. Employer-provided health insurance remained patchy, while the ACA’s marketplaces offered an alternative. A decade of data reveals that coverage gains did not automatically lift the wages of the workers at the bedside.
When the Affordable Care Act became law in 2010, it reshaped the American healthcare system in ways that rippled down to every hospital floor, nursing home hallway, and home care visit. For certified nursing assistants, those changes brought new patients, new pressures, and new questions about job security and compensation.
The Affordable Care Act rested on three main provisions that directly influenced healthcare delivery:
The logic connecting expanded insurance to CNA employment trends is straightforward. When people gain coverage, they visit doctors, schedule surgeries, and enter long-term care facilities at higher rates. Someone has to help those patients bathe, dress, eat, and move safely. That someone is often a certified nursing assistant.
In the years following full ACA implementation in 2014, healthcare facilities in expansion states reported increased patient volumes, particularly in nursing homes and community health centers serving low-income populations. This surge translated into hiring pressures for frontline staff, including CNAs.
While demand grew, so did the complexity of the job. New documentation requirements, quality reporting measures, and electronic health record mandates added administrative tasks to an already demanding role. CNAs found themselves spending more time on paperwork and less on direct patient interaction in some settings.
The ACA also intensified focus on patient satisfaction scores, which tied facility reimbursements to care quality metrics. For CNAs, this meant heightened expectations for communication, responsiveness, and emotional support alongside physical care tasks.
Understanding these shifts helps explain why CNA salary by state and facility type have varied so dramatically since 2014. The ACA did not simply create more jobs; it transformed what those jobs looked like day to day.
Did CNA salary actually increase after Obamacare passed, or did pay stay flat while the healthcare system reshaped itself? The honest answer is nuanced: nominal wages did climb, but the rate of growth and its causes are harder to pin down than a simple before-and-after chart suggests.
When the Affordable Care Act was signed into law in 2010, the national median annual wage for nursing assistants sat at roughly $24,880 (2008 figure from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey). Through the late 2000s and early 2010s, CNA pay moved upward in small annual increments, largely tracking general inflation and the slow recovery from the Great Recession. This period was defined by tight state Medicaid budgets, hiring freezes at many long-term care facilities, and modest turnover pressure on wages.
The ACA's major coverage provisions, including Medicaid expansion and the health insurance marketplaces, took full effect in 2014. In the decade that followed, national median CNA wages continued to rise in nominal terms, and by the early 2020s the median annual wage had climbed well into the mid-$30,000s. The clearest inflection point shows up around 2014-2015 in states that expanded Medicaid, and a sharper acceleration appears from 2020 onward as pandemic-driven staffing shortages forced facilities to raise base pay.
Several forces likely pushed wages up together, which is why isolating an ACA-only effect is difficult:
Wage data lags policy by two to three years, and the post-ACA period also includes the Great Recession recovery, the 2020 pandemic, and record inflation in 2022-2023. Any single-cause story oversimplifies. The next section visualizes the full decade so you can see the trajectory yourself and judge where the real turning points lie.
The Affordable Care Act reshaped healthcare demand and CNA wages over the past decade. The chart below shows the 2023 wage distribution, reflecting gradual increases since the ACA's 2014 rollout. States that expanded Medicaid saw some of the strongest gains, pushing the 75th percentile above $44,000.

States that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and those that chose not to have created a natural experiment in how healthcare policy impacts CNA wages. This policy divide has persisted for over a decade, and its effects on certified nursing assistant (CNA) compensation vary widely by location.
Medicaid expansion, a key provision of the ACA, allowed states to extend coverage to adults earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. Some states adopted expansion immediately in 2014, including California, New York, Ohio, and Kentucky. Others joined later, with states like Virginia (2019) and Missouri (2021) eventually opting in. As of 2026, roughly a dozen states have never expanded, including Texas, Florida, and Georgia. This patchwork created distinct labor markets for healthcare workers.
Researchers have employed difference-in-differences analysis to isolate the impact of expansion on healthcare worker pay, comparing wage trends in expansion and non-expansion states before and after 2014. A JAMA study examining 46 states found that healthcare worker income increased by approximately 2.16 percent in expansion states relative to non-expansion states. However, research from the University of Pennsylvania suggests these gains were not evenly distributed. Doctors, nurses, and managers captured significant wage increases, while lower-paid workers, including CNAs, saw more modest improvements.1
Wage pass-through programs, where states direct a portion of Medicaid reimbursements to frontline worker pay, showed more promise. According to a Department of Health and Human Services analysis, direct care workers in states with strong pass-through mechanisms experienced wage increases of up to 7 percent, with some programs showing effects as high as 12 percent in earlier years.2
The mechanisms connecting Medicaid expansion to CNA wages work through several channels:
The wage impact appears concentrated among full-time CNAs working in facility-based settings like hospitals and skilled nursing homes. Research from the University of Connecticut found that Medicaid expansion correlated with a 3 to 4 percent increase in work hours for nursing assistants in some markets, though there was also evidence of shifts toward part-time employment in nursing homes.3 Home health aides, who often work through agencies with different payment structures, did not see the same benefits.
The annual difference in entry level medical career salaries between CNAs in expansion and non-expansion states is difficult to pin down precisely, but some estimates suggest the gap could approach $1,500 or more annually for full-time workers in states with robust pass-through programs. That said, these figures vary considerably by state and should be interpreted with caution, as research in this area is still evolving.
Research from the University of Pennsylvania's Leonard Davis Institute found that after Medicaid expansion, doctors, nurses, and managers saw meaningful wage increases, but lower-paid workers including CNAs did not experience the same gains. In fact, the national wage-change percentage for CNAs during the expansion period was effectively zero, meaning pay stayed flat even as patient volumes grew and higher-credentialed staff earned more.
Did the Affordable Care Act actually create more CNA jobs, or did it just shift existing ones around?
The honest answer is both, but the net result has been a job market that consistently favors candidates who know how to become a CNA. Understanding why requires a quick look at what changed inside hospitals, nursing homes, and home care agencies once the ACA's major provisions took hold.
When millions of previously uninsured Americans gained coverage through the ACA's Medicaid expansion and marketplace plans, healthcare utilization climbed. More insured patients meant more admissions, more post-acute care stays, and more demand for the frontline staff who provide daily personal care. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, nursing assistant employment stood at roughly 1.4 million in 20201, and the occupation was projected to add around 115,000 new positions between 2020 and 2030, an 8 percent growth rate that outpaces many other fields2.
For context, the decade before the ACA's full implementation saw the occupation generate an estimated 500,000 total openings nationally3. The trajectory has stayed upward since.
The ACA introduced financial penalties for hospitals with high readmission rates and tied reimbursement to quality scores through value-based purchasing programs. To avoid penalties, hospitals invested more heavily in skilled nursing facility partnerships and transitional care, environments where Nursing Assistants do a significant share of the daily work. The ripple effect was real: facilities that once cut staff to save costs had new incentives to maintain adequate staffing ratios.
At the same time, the ACA expanded Medicaid waiver programs that fund home and community-based services. This shifted some employment from nursing homes to private homes and assisted living settings. For CNAs, the trade-off is nuanced: home-based roles offer more autonomy but sometimes fewer hours and less access to employer benefits than facility jobs.
Even without headline-grabbing wage growth, CNA job openings remain abundant, largely because turnover in the occupation runs high. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated that roughly 272,000 annual openings between 2019 and 2029 would come from workers moving to other occupations, and nearly 300,000 from retirements and other exits4. New job creation accounts for only a portion of total openings. In other words, the field refills itself constantly, which means a qualified CNA rarely struggles to find a position, as our guide to landing your first CNA job confirms.
It is also worth noting that CNA employment proved relatively resilient during the 2008 recession. While other sectors shed jobs sharply, demand for basic patient care did not disappear, and the occupation rebounded faster than most once the economy stabilized. The ACA years reinforced that pattern by tying healthcare funding more firmly to coverage rather than to economic cycles alone.
For anyone weighing whether this career has staying power, the employment picture is about as stable as entry-level healthcare gets.
What's the real difference between getting health insurance through your CNA employer and buying a plan on the ACA marketplace, and which option saves you money?
The answer depends on your income, your employer's contribution, and whether you qualify for subsidies. Since the Affordable Care Act launched, CNAs have had two main pathways to coverage: employer-sponsored insurance and individual marketplace plans. Each comes with trade-offs in cost, coverage, and out-of-pocket expenses.
Nationwide, about 60% of non-elderly adults have employer-sponsored health insurance as of March 2025. But eligibility and enrollment vary widely by income. Among workers earning below 200% of the federal poverty level, a bracket that includes many full-time CNAs, just 22.5% carry employer-sponsored insurance. For workers between 200% and 399% of the poverty line, coverage climbs to 57.2%, and at 400% or higher, it reaches 82.5%.1
Many CNAs work for facilities that offer health plans, but eligibility often hinges on full-time status, waiting periods, or part-time exclusions. Even when eligible, some CNAs decline employer plans because the employee contribution feels unaffordable on a modest salary.
For those who do enroll, the average annual premium for a single-coverage employer plan in 2025 is $9,325, with workers paying an average of $1,440 of that total, about 16% of the premium. Family coverage averages $26,993 annually, and workers contribute roughly $6,850, or 26%. The average deductible for single coverage sits at $1,886, meaning you'll need to spend nearly two thousand dollars out-of-pocket before most benefits kick in.2
For a CNA earning $35,000 to $40,000 a year, those upfront costs can sting, especially if family members need coverage.
The ACA marketplace offers another route. Low- and moderate-income earners often qualify for premium tax credits that reduce monthly costs, sometimes dramatically. You can explore plan options and subsidy eligibility using the window-shopping feature on HealthCare.gov without creating an account. Enter your ZIP code, household size, and estimated income to see real premiums and cost-sharing reductions.
For many CNAs, especially those working part-time or in states that expanded Medicaid, marketplace plans paired with subsidies can cost less per month than employer coverage, though network breadth and out-of-pocket maximums vary.
To compare benefits and see where CNAs stand nationally, visit BLS.gov and search "National Compensation Survey." The survey publishes average wages and benefits for nursing assistants, including the percentage who receive employer-sponsored insurance and the employer's share of premiums. The Kaiser Family Foundation's annual Employer Health Benefits Survey offers national averages on employee premium contributions, deductibles, and coverage trends across industries.
For state-specific insights, contact your state's nursing assistant registry or professional associations like the National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long Term Care (NADONA), which publishes localized benefit reports and advocacy resources. Many state registries also link to workforce studies that break down wages and benefits by region and facility type.
Wage increases on paper don't always mean more money in your pocket. That's because inflation, the rising cost of goods and services, shrinks the buying power of each dollar. To see whether CNAs truly earned more after the Affordable Care Act, we need to look at real wages: nominal pay adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U)2.
Nominal wages are the dollars shown on your paycheck. Real wages show what those dollars can actually buy after accounting for inflation. Over the past 15 years, CNA salaries have grown on paper, but the real story has been more mixed.
For illustration, using approximate Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) national median figures and the CPI-U, here is how CNA wages translate into 2024 dollars:
These calculations show that despite nominal raises, real purchasing power barely budged between 2010 and 2014 and then climbed modestly only to stall again as inflation surged.
The sharp price increases of 2021 to 2023 hit low-wage workers especially hard. From 2019 to 2023, nominal CNA wages rose about 22%, but after adjusting for inflation, the real gain was just a few hundred dollars. By 2025, with inflation still running above historical averages3, any further nominal gains may have been entirely offset, leaving real wages essentially flat.
Persistent inflation erodes even moderate pay increases. A wage that rises 3% when prices rise 4% means a real loss. Over a career, the cumulative effect can be significant: a CNA who never receives real wage growth will see their standard of living stagnate or decline over time. This underscores why CNAs need benefits, career ladders, and smart budgeting to get ahead, not just a bump in the headline hourly rate.
The upcoming infographic visualizes this gap between nominal and real wage growth, making it clear how inflation can silently undo what looks like progress.
While CNA paychecks have seen steady nominal increases, inflation has significantly reduced real wage growth. From 2013 to 2023, the median CNA salary rose 47% in current dollars but only 12% after adjusting for inflation. In fact, since 2018, real wages have barely budged, eroding the purchasing power of nursing assistants.

Below, we rank the states with available data by median annual salary for nursing assistants, from highest to lowest. Many of the top-paying states are also those that expanded Medicaid under the ACA, which often coincides with higher costs of living and greater demand for healthcare workers. The table includes total employment figures to give a sense of the size of the CNA workforce in each state, based on BLS data.
| Rank | State | Median Annual Salary | Total Employment | Medicaid Expansion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oregon | $48,390 | 12,800 | Expanded |
| 2 | Washington | $48,260 | 28,080 | Expanded |
| 3 | New York | $47,390 | 85,310 | Expanded |
| 4 | District of Columbia | $46,860 | 2,550 | Expanded |
| 5 | California | $46,420 | 102,380 | Expanded |
| 6 | New Hampshire | $46,050 | 7,190 | Expanded |
| 7 | Alaska | $45,840 | 1,660 | Expanded |
| 8 | Maine | $45,640 | 8,590 | Expanded |
| 9 | Minnesota | $45,580 | 26,970 | Expanded |
| 10 | Massachusetts | $45,410 | 38,280 | Expanded |
| 11 | Nevada | $45,060 | 8,670 | Expanded |
| 12 | Colorado | $44,950 | 20,880 | Expanded |
| 13 | New Jersey | $44,910 | 31,310 | Expanded |
| 14 | Hawaii | $44,830 | 4,620 | Expanded |
| 15 | Illinois | $44,750 | 64,660 | Expanded |
| 16 | Connecticut | $44,500 | 21,390 | Expanded |
| 17 | North Dakota | $44,190 | 6,920 | Expanded |
| 18 | Rhode Island | $44,160 | 8,450 | Expanded |
| 19 | Vermont | $43,610 | 3,140 | Expanded |
| 20 | Wisconsin | $43,250 | 27,480 | Not Expanded |
| 21 | Arizona | $41,980 | 17,350 | Expanded |
| 22 | Pennsylvania | $41,110 | 65,410 | Expanded |
| 23 | Maryland | $40,000 | 24,230 | Expanded |
| 24 | Montana | $39,300 | 4,800 | Expanded |
About 11 percent of certified nursing assistants belonged to a union as of 20251, a figure that has climbed modestly but steadily since the Affordable Care Act reshaped the healthcare labor landscape more than a decade ago. While that number still trails the roughly 17.5 percent unionization rate reported for nurses in 20212, it signals a growing push among frontline caregivers to secure protections that go well beyond hourly wages.
The combination of expanded patient coverage under the ACA and the staffing shortages exposed during the pandemic gave CNAs new leverage at the bargaining table. Research shows that unionized direct care workers earn roughly 7.8 percent more per week than their non-union peers2 and are significantly less likely to fall below the poverty line.3 Retention also improves dramatically: one study found that unionized nursing assistants were nearly four times as likely to stay in their positions compared to those without union representation.2 Public-sector facilities lead the way, with a unionization rate of about 31.7 percent among direct care workers, while for-profit settings lag behind at roughly 8.6 percent.2
States like Oregon and Washington have moved to codify minimum nurse-to-patient ratios and mandatory rest periods, legislation that was partly catalyzed by the quality metrics the ACA tied to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. When facilities face financial penalties for poor patient outcomes, policymakers have an easier case for mandating adequate staffing levels. These laws do not guarantee higher pay on their own, but they can reduce burnout, lower injury rates, and make the job more sustainable over the long term.
The ACA's employer mandate required facilities with 50 or more full-time workers to offer health coverage or face penalties. Some employers absorbed the cost; others looked for offsets. Industry observers have noted that certain long-term care providers responded by trimming overtime hours, reducing paid-leave allotments, or scaling back retirement-plan contributions. Comprehensive national data on CNA access to paid leave and retirement benefits before and after the ACA remains limited, so it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion. What is clear, however, is that employer-sponsored benefits vary widely by state, facility type, and union status.
Wages matter, but they are only one piece of a CNA's compensation package. Health insurance, paid sick leave, retirement contributions, predictable scheduling, and safe working conditions all factor into whether a position is genuinely sustainable. As you evaluate job offers or consider where to train, look at the complete picture:
The ACA's legacy for CNAs is not captured in a single wage number. It lives in the broader set of protections, benefits, and working conditions that together determine whether a career as a nursing assistant is one you can build a life on.
Get clear, evidence-based answers to common questions about how the Affordable Care Act has affected CNA salaries, job prospects, and benefits.
The ACA did not directly raise CNA wages. While healthcare demand grew, wage growth for CNAs has been modest. BLS data shows a median annual wage of about $20,0023, but this reflects broader economic factors, not solely the ACA.
There is no clear evidence that CNAs earn more in expansion states. Research by PHI and others focuses on insurance coverage, not wages. In expansion states, low-income nursing assistants had higher health coverage rates (90% vs 80%) and higher Medicaid enrollment (50%)2, but wage differences are not documented.
The ACA drastically expanded health coverage for CNAs. Before the ACA, 28% of nursing home nursing assistants were uninsured1. By 2014, 500,000 direct-care workers, including home health aides, gained coverage, and the uninsured rate fell 26%1. Among low-earning health care workers, Medicaid coverage increased by 3.15 percentage points4.
The ACA did not directly mandate paid leave for CNAs. Its focus was health insurance coverage. While some states may have enhanced benefits, there is no federal ACA provision requiring paid leave for nursing assistants.
By expanding insurance coverage to millions, the ACA increased demand for healthcare services, creating more job opportunities for CNAs and other related healthcare careers. More insured patients, particularly through Medicaid expansion, led to higher utilization of long-term care and nursing services, boosting employment.
Some employers may have adjusted hours to avoid the employer mandate, potentially reducing hours for some CNAs. Additionally, while coverage expanded, some CNAs still face high deductibles or narrow networks. However, the overall uninsured rate dropped significantly1.
CNAs can pursue additional certifications, gain experience in high-demand settings like hospitals, or move to states with higher wages. They can also explore unionized workplaces, advocate for state-level policy changes, or use CNA online resources to find additional certification options, as the ACA does not directly set wages.